From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "A(dot) Mous" <a(dot)mous(at)shaw(dot)ca> |
Cc: | "Richard Huxton" <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Lincoln Yeoh" <lyeoh(at)pop(dot)jaring(dot)my>, <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Simple query takes a long time on win2K |
Date: | 2005-03-23 19:04:12 |
Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE6C713F@algol.sollentuna.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers-win32 |
> > The confusing thing for me is that so far, the only
> consistent pattern
> > here is that machines running win2k Pro take roughly 4 seconds to
> > deliver the data to the client, while win XP machines perform much
> > better (<200ms to deliver recordset). I've tried installing QoS
> > packet scheduler on win2K pro machines to no avail.
>
> I really thought the QoS thing would be it. Maybe there was
> some other thing to do, configuration-wise, to make that do
> its thing properly?
>
> If you could reproduce this behavior across the network I
> would tell you to get out a packet analyzer (ethereal or some
> such) and sniff the traffic to learn more. Are there any
> programs that can sniff local TCP traffic on win2k?
Microsoft ships a network monitor with Win2k Server. Otherwise, just get
ethereal, it works perfectly on win2k.
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | elein | 2005-03-23 19:38:21 | debug_print_plan |
Previous Message | Andrus | 2005-03-23 18:47:36 | Re: Using sequence name depending on other column |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
PostgreSQL : | A. Mous | 2005-03-23 19:57:46 | PostgreSQL : Re : 간단한 쿼리는 롤 토토에서 오랜 시간이 걸립니다 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-03-23 18:11:18 | Re: Simple query takes a long time on win2K |