From: | molofeev <molofeev3(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #15142: ERROR: MultiXactId nnnnn has not been created yet -- apparent wraparound in v9.5 |
Date: | 2018-04-05 11:46:57 |
Message-ID: | 6e589f1d-851e-790b-b9d0-fcbf9835154c@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
> 4. Obviously the data in the corrupted block is not easily recoverable.
> If you need to recover the remaining data in the table, it could
> probably best be done by zeroing only this specific block. Whether this
> is worth doing will depend on whether it would be easier to just
> recreate the data.
If fsync was disabled when I work with table, can I restore block
3220146 (by zeroing or maybe remove it)?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | molofeev | 2018-04-05 11:48:11 | Re: BUG #15142: ERROR: MultiXactId nnnnn has not been created yet -- apparent wraparound in v9.5 |
Previous Message | molofeev | 2018-04-05 07:02:35 | Re: BUG #15142: ERROR: MultiXactId nnnnn has not been created yet -- apparent wraparound in v9.5 |