| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Nicolai Tufar <ntufar(at)gmail(dot)com>, devrim(at)kivi(dot)com(dot)tr, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] snprintf() argument reordering not working under Windows |
| Date: | 2005-12-03 17:00:32 |
| Message-ID: | 742.1133629232@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I am also thinking of modifying the code so if we are using snprintf.c
> only because we need positional parameter control, we check for '$' in
> the string and only use snprintf.c in those cases.
What's the point? If the code is in there we may as well use it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Brown | 2005-12-03 17:09:53 | Re: Reducing relation locking overhead |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-03 16:57:49 | Re: Reducing relation locking overhead |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-03 17:19:00 | Re: [HACKERS] snprintf() argument reordering not working under |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-03 16:46:11 | Re: BUG #2056: to_char no long takes time as input? |