From: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(dot)lelarge(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-translators(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: branching soon |
Date: | 2025-03-03 16:33:54 |
Message-ID: | 79f4096d-6953-4746-ad81-5c1a26915006@dalibo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-translators |
On 02/03/2025 18:17, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 24.02.25 11:14, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> One reason I would like to move forward with this soon is that I would
>> like to get <https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/5429/> committed
>> and run it through the whole pipeline before feature freeze.
>
> I have committed a subset of that patch to try it out. Specifically, I
> have committed the part for pg_checksums. So you can try out
> translating pg_checksums for PG18.
>
> The issue is the new approach for embedding int64_t format directives.
> See explanation here: <https://www.gnu.org/software/gettext/manual/
> html_node/No-string-concatenation.html#The-_003cinttypes_002eh_003e-
> macros>. So it should like this
>
> #: pg_checksums.c:144
> #, c-format
> msgid "%<PRId64>/%<PRId64> MB (%d%%) computed"
> msgstr "%<PRId64>/%<PRId64> MB (%d%%) berechnet"
>
> (I don't expect any particular problems. It's just worth trying it at
> small scale first.)
>
It looks like it is working for me.
--
Guillaume Lelarge
Consultant
https://dalibo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2025-03-02 17:17:38 | Re: branching soon |