| From: | Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: lazy detoasting |
| Date: | 2018-04-10 21:19:36 |
| Message-ID: | 7d10686f-4190-fe75-6e42-adb4223f3fe0@anastigmatix.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/10/2018 05:04 PM, Chapman Flack wrote:
> If I'm a function, and ... I found [the datum] myself, say by an
> SPI query within the function, usually that's at a level of abstraction
> somewhere above what-snapshot-was-used-in-the-scan.
It looks like for that case (since the commit 08e261cbc that Tom
mentioned earlier), there can sometimes be a portal->holdSnapshot
that will be the right one.
-Chap
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2018-04-10 21:24:35 | Re: pgsql: Validate page level checksums in base backups |
| Previous Message | Martín Marqués | 2018-04-10 21:13:48 | vacuum_cost_limit doc description patch |