From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Chris Bitmead <chris(dot)bitmead(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] HSavage bug in Postgresql beta? |
Date: | 1999-04-27 14:25:39 |
Message-ID: | 8268.925223139@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Chris Bitmead <chris(dot)bitmead(at)bigfoot(dot)com> writes:
> SELECT story.approved, story.oid FROM story, webuser, category* WHERE
> story.webuser = webuser.oid AND story.category = category.oid and
> approved;
> [ fails to find tuples it should find ]
Youch. I could not duplicate that here on a toy example, which may
mean there is a recently-fixed bug, or it may just mean that there
are additional conditions required to trigger the bug.
What does EXPLAIN say about the plans used for the two queries?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 1999-04-27 14:28:32 | Re: [HACKERS] numeric data type on 6.5 |
Previous Message | Oleg Broytmann | 1999-04-27 14:02:27 | Re: [HACKERS] RE: Mysql comparison |