UPSERT as a table name is confusing

From: Y Liu <yliu11(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Y Liu <yliu11(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Subject: UPSERT as a table name is confusing
Date: 2022-08-15 12:41:07
Message-ID: 86847680.1859611.1660567267467@mail.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

RE: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/UPSERT
It is really confusing to use UPSERT as a table name in a sql to demo the usage of INSERT INTO UPSERT...ON CONFLICT. How about using a different table name to show the same thing? Just a suggestion.
Thanks,Eugene

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan S. Katz 2022-08-15 13:52:56 Re: UPSERT as a table name is confusing
Previous Message Marcel Hofstetter 2022-08-15 09:37:42 PostgreSQL package download for Solaris 11.4