| From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
| Cc: | Troels Arvin <troels(at)arvin(dot)dk>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance |
| Date: | 2004-02-27 02:13:36 |
| Message-ID: | 871xohjmlr.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> Damn, yeah, you're right. Neil was going to code something so that
> "WITH UPDATE" would automatically translate into the creation of 2-3
> rules. But he got distracted ...
Indeed, the tragedy of being unable to work on PG full time :-)
But it hardly matters to the subject at hand: as I mentioned on IRC,
AFAIK there is *plenty* of stuff in SQL92 we don't support.
-Neil
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gavin Sherry | 2004-02-27 02:45:42 | Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2004-02-27 02:08:32 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |