| From: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: assert in nested SQL procedure call in current HEAD |
| Date: | 2018-06-08 04:20:42 |
| Message-ID: | 87a7s5x6bq.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
>>>>> "Joe" == Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
Joe> My colleague Yogesh Sharma discovered an assert in nested SQL
Joe> procedure calls after ROLLBACK is used. Minimal test case and
Joe> backtrace below. I have not yet tried to figure out exactly what
Joe> is going on beyond seeing that it occurs in pg_plan_query() where
Joe> the comment says "Planner must have a snapshot in case it calls
Joe> user-defined functions"...
Andrew> /message-id/29608.1518533639@sss.pgh.pa.us
I added it to the open items list since nobody else seems to have taken
notice; from Tom's linked message it seems this should be Peter E's bag?
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-06-08 04:56:36 | Re: Performance regression with PostgreSQL 11 and partitioning |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-06-08 03:54:14 | Re: config.{guess,sub} updates |