Re: Open 7.3 items

From: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Open 7.3 items
Date: 2002-08-07 15:20:19
Message-ID: 87u1m6g0gc.fsf@klamath.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Do we have a list going of the things we want to fix in the next
> protocol change? Offhand I remember
>
> * redesign startup packet to eliminate fixed field widths
> * fix COPY protocol to allow resync after errors, support binary data
> * less brain-dead protocol for fast-path function calls
> * allow NOTIFY to include parameters
> * richer ERROR reports (error codes, other stuff)

Some kind of parameter binding or improved support for prepareable
statements would require changes to the FE/BE protocol -- being able
to accept parameters without passing them through the parser, for
example.

Allowing clients to cleanly determine the current transaction state
will require FE/BE protocol changes, I think. (Or at least, that's my
vague recollection of the discussion on -hackers from a couple months ago).

That's all I can think of -- there's probably more stuff...

Cheers,

Neil

--
Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2002-08-07 15:22:15 Re: CLUSTER and indisclustered
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2002-08-07 15:13:54 Re: CLUSTER and indisclustered