| From: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] What's left? |
| Date: | 2004-03-03 17:20:21 |
| Message-ID: | 87y8qhaluy.fsf@stark.xeocode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | Postg토토 꽁 머니SQL pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> the point is that PostgreSQL is no GNU product, never has been and if someone
> intends to he shall do so after yanking out the contributions I made.
Note that when you released your contributions you did so under a license that
imposed no such conditions. If Microsoft wanted to release a Microsoft
Postgresql under a completely proprietary license they would be free to do so.
Likewise if someone wanted to release a GPL'd "GNU Postgresql" they could do
it. And nobody could force either to yank anyone's code.
--
greg
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-03-03 17:34:20 | Re: Thread safe connection-name mapping in ECPG. Is it |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-03-03 17:06:36 | Re: simple make check failures |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-03-03 17:52:40 | Re: Tablespaces |
| Previous Message | Barry Lind | 2004-03-03 17:05:41 | Re: Tablespaces |