From: | Andy Balholm <andy(at)balholm(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Postgres-Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: bugs that have not been replied-to on list |
Date: | 2010-04-19 14:43:01 |
Message-ID: | 8933DCF4-6231-4D91-811B-0A4FA37F25A5@balholm.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | Postg메이저 토토 사이트SQL : Postg메이저 토토 사이트SQL 메일 링리스트 : 2010-04-19 이후 PGSQL-BUGS 14:43 |
Despite all the problems with PostgreSQL's bug-tracking system or non-system, I've found it much nicer to deal with than OpenOffice's.
I really like the fact that it's e-mail based rather than web based. Part of the reason for that is that I have e-mail but not web access, so I can deal with it myself instead of trying to get my brother to file bugs for me. It's the only bug-discussion list I've seen that you can subscribe to by e-mail, and I think that's a great idea.
But that's not the only advantage of having it e-mail based. I think a personal e-mail response is much more pleasant than a form letter someone generated by clicking on a web form.
By the way, the issue I submitted was more of a feature request than a bug. I sent it to -bugs because I couldn't find a mailing list for discussion of possible new features. If you had (and documented) a list for new features, it might reduce some of the triage needed on -bugs.
Andy Balholm
(509) 276-2065
andy(at)balholm(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-04-19 15:04:00 | Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4887: inclusion operator (@>) on tsqeries behaves not conforming to documentation |
Previous Message | Jamie Strachan | 2010-04-19 14:22:50 | BUG #5430: initdb fails due to permissions of /usr/share/pgsql |