| From: | "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: CRCs (was: beta testing version) |
| Date: | 2000-12-07 20:22:12 |
| Message-ID: | 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A234D31DE@sectorbase1.sectorbase.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > That's why an end marker must follow all valid records.
...
>
> That requires an extra out-of-sequence write.
Yes, and also increase probability to corrupt already committed
to log data.
> (I'd also like to see CRCs on all the table blocks as well; is there
> a place to put them?)
Do we need it? "physical log" feature suggested by Andreas will protect
us from non atomic data block writes.
Vadim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nathan Myers | 2000-12-07 20:25:41 | Re: CRCs (was: beta testing version) |
| Previous Message | Mikheev, Vadim | 2000-12-07 20:12:31 | RE: pre-beta is slow |