| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Dominic J(dot) Eidson" <sauron(at)the-infinite(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Patch to include PAM support... |
| Date: | 2001-06-12 16:32:12 |
| Message-ID: | 9043.992363532@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Is there any interest in PAM support? If not, I will reject this patch.
We have seen multiple requests for PAM support, so there's interest out
there. But IIRC, I had some serious concerns about this proposed
implementation.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vince Roberts | 2001-06-12 16:33:51 | lo_copy routine |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-06-12 16:28:44 | Improving pg_hba.conf |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-06-12 16:35:10 | Re: Patch to include PAM support... |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-06-12 16:27:44 | Re: Patch to include PAM support... |