| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "movead(dot)li(at)highgo(dot)ca" <movead(dot)li(at)highgo(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | "Daniel Verite" <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "ashutosh(dot)bapat" <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: A bug when use get_bit() function for a long bytea string |
| Date: | 2020-04-07 15:02:43 |
| Message-ID: | 9172.1586271763@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"movead(dot)li(at)highgo(dot)ca" <movead(dot)li(at)highgo(dot)ca> writes:
> After several patch change by hacker's proposal, I think it's ready to
> commit, can we commit it before doing the code freeze for pg-13?
It would be easier to get this done if you had addressed any of the
objections to the patch as given. Integer-overflow handling is still
missing, and you still are assuming that it's okay to change catalog
entries in released branches.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2020-04-07 15:15:21 | Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join |
| Previous Message | Juan José Santamaría Flecha | 2020-04-07 15:00:18 | Re: PG compilation error with Visual Studio 2015/2017/2019 |