| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan |
| Date: | 2008-02-06 16:36:14 |
| Message-ID: | 937d27e10802060836tece7401y2645f71fc7a61f96@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Feb 6, 2008 4:24 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
>
>
> I would rather set a target and modify it if necessary based on
> experience than have none at all.
>
> The danger of not doing so is that we'll be in almost constant 'commit
> fest' mode.
Yes, that is something we discussed, and the reason why we used the
wording 'proposed timetable for the cycle'. We will adjust the timing
if need be, but wanted to start out on a confident note :-)
/D
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-02-06 16:48:15 | Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan |
| Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2008-02-06 16:31:56 | Re: pg_dump additional options for performance |