| From: | Matheus Ricardo Espanhol <matheusespanhol(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: "Hot standby"? |
| Date: | 2009-08-11 11:52:31 |
| Message-ID: | 9ae044220908110452i7f39adc7m658b2cac7be6c307@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> Am I off? What other definition of terms justifies the description of "hot
> standby"?
>
I think that "Hot Standby" is associated with the high WAL recovery
capacity.
In my opinion, is a good term to symbolizes the superiority compared with
"Warm Standby".
--
Matheus Ricardo Espanhol
---------------------------------------
Dextra Sistemas
http://www.dextra.com.br/postgres/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-08-11 12:17:44 | TODO list, was Re: WIP: to_char, support for EEEE format |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2009-08-11 11:52:13 | Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows |