| From: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Streaming a base backup from master |
| Date: | 2010-09-03 12:16:25 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTikLGyzGQW5LLSML8f7NRkBkn30Lwnfb0Qmxb5g5@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> * We need a smarter way to do pg_start/stop_backup() with this. At the
> moment, you can only have one backup running at a time, but we shouldn't
> have that limitation with this built-in mechanism.
Well there's no particular reason we couldn't support having multiple
pg_start_backup() pending either. It's just not usually something
people have need so far.
--
greg
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2010-09-03 12:27:36 | Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ... |
| Previous Message | PostgreSQL - Hans-Jürgen Schönig | 2010-09-03 12:16:21 | Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ... |