| From: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: multibyte charater set in levenshtein function |
| Date: | 2010-05-13 06:49:13 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinjLfIASGJN_58kOVQ6kFWON0yXZngCY8kppfRa@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com
> wrote:
> Well, since it's only used in one place, why are you defining a macro at
> all?
>
In order to structure code better. My question was about another. Is memcmp
function good choice to compare very short sequences of bytes (from 1 to 4
bytes)?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-05-13 07:20:04 | Re: Tags missing from GIT mirror? |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-05-13 06:33:06 | Re: How to know killed by pg_terminate_backend |