From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
Cc: | pgus-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Draft bylaws are now available |
Date: | 2008-06-16 18:38:16 |
Message-ID: | B421CD74-21F6-4683-BB5C-3482C2B2C459@kineticode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | Postg토토 사이트 순위SQL |
On Jun 16, 2008, at 13:31, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Actually, it all seems pretty clear to me, and it's not like the
> above.
> First of all:
>
> -- All board votes, unless otherwise noted, are a vote of the
> Directors
> attending a meeting. Directors not attending are not counted.
I don't recall seeing that in the bylaws, and there are a couple of
different ways in which it refers to board votes, including:
Section III.10: "by a vote of two-thirds of the Directors then in
office". This is about all directors, not just a quorum.
Section III.11: "Board shall, by a majority vote". no mention of
whether it's "all directors then in office, so I guess assume it
requires a quorum at a meeting? It's not clear to me.
> -- The quorum for a meeting of the *directors* is a majority of the
> directors who exist when the meeting starts. Any majority vote by
> them is
> an Act of the corporation. Thus, the minimum number of votes
> required to
> pass an act with 7 directors would be 3. It would never be less
> than 2.
In Section II.8, it says, "Those votes represented at a meeting of
members shall constitute a quorum." It does not specify a minimum
number. That's membership.
Then, in Section III.8, it says, "A majority of the Directors in
office immediately before the meeting begins shall constitute a quorum
at any meeting." So I guess you do need to have at least 4 directors
present at a board meeting to have a quorum, so there would need to be
at least 3 votes to have a majority with 4 at the meeting.
> -- Meetings of members have no discernable quorum. It's whoever
> shows up.
Okay, that's II.8 I guess.
> -- Amendments to the bylaws require a majority of *sitting*
> directors, not
> just those in attendence at the meeting.
>
> -- Proxies only apply to meetings of the *members*, i.e. the Annual
> meeting.
Right, of course.
> Again, it all seems pretty clear to me.
I guess my biggest question is when it says, as in III.11, where it
just mentions a majority of votes of the board, without indicating
whether that means the quorum or a majority of all directors then in
office.
Best,
David
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Broersma | 2008-07-02 20:05:32 | Re: Draft bylaws are now available |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2008-06-16 18:31:05 | Re: Draft bylaws are now available |