| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: We probably need autovacuum_max_wraparound_workers |
| Date: | 2012-06-28 13:53:46 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoY3kyGQNz6wOO0Sd2Kh3uTLAQ8dkCBQzjgSW2970Qqbdg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> You are inventing problem details to fit
> your solution.
Well, what I'm actually doing is assuming that Josh's customers have
the same problem that our customers do.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-06-28 13:57:00 | Re: Posix Shared Mem patch |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-06-28 13:51:56 | Re: We probably need autovacuum_max_wraparound_workers |