| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Event Triggers reduced, v1 |
| Date: | 2012-07-20 19:51:04 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZKLjCQk9pBpNJ2gDD8wfm64b9XL-yRXFoN3kfEyUYfQA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> The Windows buildfarm members don't seem too happy with the latest
> patch.
I'm looking at this now, but am so far mystified. Something's
obviously broken as regards how the trigger flags get set up, but if
that were broken in a trivial way it would be broken everywhere, and
it's not. Will keep searching...
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-07-20 19:52:27 | Re: Event Triggers reduced, v1 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-07-20 19:45:15 | Re: Restrict ALTER FUNCTION CALLED ON NULL INPUT (was Re: Not quite a security hole: CREATE LANGUAGE for non-superusers) |