| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>, david(at)pgmasters(dot)net, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Cary Huang <cary(dot)huang(at)highgo(dot)ca>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Logging which local address was connected to in log_line_prefix |
| Date: | 2025-04-07 16:23:06 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoa2kFddGtjsLN5e7M3tBE-hwE20vf+4LseUwL64C5xCuQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 11:59 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > The only thing that makes me a little bit sad is that we don't seem to
> > have added this to pg_stat_activity.
>
> Hmm, that seems like it'd be a completely separate discussion.
Yes, not something we should try to squeeze in right before freeze,
just a thought!
> My main objection to the idea is that if we do that then everybody
> will pay the overhead for it, whether they use it or not.
I was hoping that the overhead would be small enough that nobody would
really care.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2025-04-07 16:27:46 | Re: Draft for basic NUMA observability |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2025-04-07 16:20:15 | Re: AIO v2.5 |