| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: heap vacuum & cleanup locks |
| Date: | 2011-11-08 02:54:43 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaY_j2TFjPS3fe5iwCCy617uJELZd2mkcYSij4PQ5b+6g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Doing that actually makes the patch simpler, so I went ahead and did
> that in the attached version, along with the renaming mentioned above.
Hearing no objections, I went ahead and committed this version.
Thanks for coding this up; I think this is a very useful improvement.
It would still be nice to fix the case where we need to freeze a tuple
that is on a page someone else has pinned, but I don't have any good
ideas for how to do that.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-11-08 02:55:16 | Re: removing =>(text, text) in 9.2 |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-11-08 02:35:23 | Re: synchronous commit vs. hint bits |