From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Aggregate Push Down - Performing aggregation on foreign server |
Date: | 2016-09-16 14:08:48 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaxZgAY4uFxxcaXBVRtmgAUcFk94CJ8fwKVom=zN=RbBw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Jeevan Chalke
<jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> 6. Per my understanding, I think checking for just aggregate function is
> enough as we are interested in whole aggregate result.
+1.
> Meanwhile I will
> check whether we need to find and check shippability of transition,
> combination and finalization functions or not.
I don't think that'd be appropriate. The user is calling the
aggregate, not its constituent functions.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christoph Berg | 2016-09-16 14:11:06 | Re: OpenSSL 1.1 breaks configure and more |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-09-16 13:59:32 | Re: Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem |