| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: erroneous restore into pg_catalog schema |
| Date: | 2013-01-15 20:04:45 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob0gSPruuYSTh0vZaPiZ+f8tDafm2dJuRVtNDrcATxYdQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Right, that is the argument for ignoring missing schemas, and I think it
> is entirely sensible for *search* activities. But allowing *creation*
> to occur in an indeterminate schema is a horrid idea.
But the default search path is $user, public; and of those two, only
the latter exists by default.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2013-01-15 20:09:38 | Re: erroneous restore into pg_catalog schema |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2013-01-15 20:04:13 | Re: Save The Date: Cluster-Hackers meeting May 21st |