| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions |
| Date: | 2016-03-08 22:16:34 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob1d8pxnzTOTDDVotcwS_xfO796u4oeQLN3PAQToaebrA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> Instead of "durable" I think that "persistent" makes more sense.
>
> I find durable a lot more descriptive. persistent could refer to
> retrying the rename or something.
Yeah, I like durable, too.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2016-03-08 22:17:05 | Re: SP-GiST support for inet datatypes |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-03-08 22:14:40 | Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions |