| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Declarative partitioning |
| Date: | 2015-11-05 16:29:48 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobUi=u1TswwFoi+TU_+XZvJhTrxG-JgZ0OrJmOe7cX87g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> The DDL and catalogs part are not much different from what I had last
> described though I took a few steps to simplify things. I dropped the
> multi-level partitioning bit
Hmm, that doesn't sound good to me. I think multi-level partitioning
is a reasonably important use case.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-11-05 16:36:51 | Re: FORCE ROW LEVEL SECURITY |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-11-05 16:27:49 | Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c |