From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Paul Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges? |
Date: | 2019-08-01 10:22:23 |
Message-ID: | CA+hUKGJAYsxAkh48N2+VC1djaATqWna=ERouiLtXqdj6Er7Cmg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 1:01 AM Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I have rebased the patch to master (1e2fddfa33d3c7cc93ca3ee0f32852699bd3e012) and fixed some compilation warning. Now I am reviewing the actual code.
Thanks for doing that Ibrar. I think the right status for this CF
entry is now: Needs review. I have set it that way, in the September
CF. By the way, there are some test failures:
https://ci.appveyor.com/project/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/build/1.0.50280
--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2019-08-01 10:24:54 | Re: How to retain lesser paths at add_path()? |
Previous Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2019-08-01 10:13:24 | Re: Avoid full GIN index scan when possible |