Re: Drop type "smgr"?

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Drop type "smgr"?
Date: 2019-03-07 02:55:37
Message-ID: CA+hUKGL6dTxXxg1jBPY+YmJbceDxCxcjO33CVYpJuZiX8wAzng@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: Postg토토 사이트 순위SQL

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 7:02 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The type smgr has only one value 'magnetic disk'. ~15 years ago it
> also had a value 'main memory', and in Berkeley POSTGRES 4.2 there was
> a third value 'sony jukebox'. Back then, all tables had an associated
> block storage manager, and it was recorded as an attribute relsmgr of
> pg_class (or pg_relation as it was known further back). This was the
> type of that attribute, removed by Bruce in 3fa2bb31 (1997).
>
> Nothing seems to break if you remove it (except for some tests using
> it in an incidental way). See attached.

Pushed.

Thanks all for the interesting discussion. I'm trying out Anton
Shyrabokau's suggestion of stealing bits from the fork number. More
on that soon.

--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2019-03-07 03:24:22 Re: [HACKERS] Weaker shmem interlock w/o postmaster.pid
Previous Message Andres Freund 2019-03-07 02:38:38 Re: pg_dump is broken for partition tablespaces