| From: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Subject: | Re: Question: test "aggregates" failed in 32-bit machine |
| Date: | 2022-10-02 20:35:55 |
| Message-ID: | CAApHDvpxPyGgkDi3Kk30zXOAswz=nAWX_ryo=vLeg_eeUx_9aA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 at 08:10, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> As attached.
For the master version, I think it's safe just to get rid of
PlannerInfo.num_groupby_pathkeys now. I only added that so I could
strip off the ORDER BY / DISTINCT aggregate PathKeys from the group by
pathkeys before passing to the functions that rearranged the GROUP BY
clause.
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2022-10-02 20:52:01 | Re: CI and test improvements |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2022-10-02 20:22:01 | Re: disfavoring unparameterized nested loops |