| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions |
| Date: | 2016-02-02 04:36:16 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqR2Aycvo3Xp6ZTAobD_vU+tpm_UcPxBYSEmrcCi_m8m0g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> And now there are patches. Well, nobody has complained about that until now except me... So we could live without patching back-branches, but it don't think it hurts much to fix those holes.
Meh, s/it don't/I don't/
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kouhei Kaigai | 2016-02-02 04:39:54 | Re: Way to check whether a particular block is on the shared_buffer? |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-02-02 04:35:37 | Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions |