| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stas Kelvich <s(dot)kelvich(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Speedup twophase transactions |
| Date: | 2016-01-12 12:53:25 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqRvfVJttSSRAiokqxnD-S9ufTCO3nrRQCxYX1OF6xjHOQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Should we just move the code somewhere just to imply it is generic? Seems
> pointless refactoring to me.
Er, why not xlogutils.c? Having the 2PC code depending directly on
something that is within logicalfuncs.c is weird.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2016-01-12 12:54:21 | Re: checkpointer continuous flushing |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-01-12 12:49:38 | Re: Speedup twophase transactions |