From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Breen Hagan <breen(at)rtda(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: BUG #13755: pgwin32_is_service not checking if SECURITY_SERVICE_SID is disabled |
Date: | 2016-11-08 01:33:28 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqTPpiY_tRrduCb+VVpuok2gG_umth-rMyAXgZ_4xGWBCg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | Postg무지개 토토SQL : Postg무지개 토토SQL 메일 링리스트 : 2016-11-08 이후 PGSQL-BUGS 01:33 pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:31 PM, MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Yes, I tested both your patch and mine. I used the attached pg_ctl.c.
> It adds -z option which disables SECURITY_SERVICE_RID.
Okay, so you did exactly what I did except that you wrapped with an option...
> I guess you registered the service without specifying the service
> account with -U. Then the service runs as the Local System account,
> whence pgwin32_is_service() returns 1.
Thank you, that's as you said. I was just using the local user account
which is why I did not see the difference. And now I can. I finished
by not using your version of pg_ctl but mine still the result is the
same. Hm, now that we are two folks able to test the difference, I'd
suggest that a committer pops up and pushes the one-liner patch I sent
upthread and back-patches it.
For the refactoring, I guess that we could sort that later on, and I
promise to look at soon. The issue reported on this thread has been
here for 1 year, I am glad that someone finally came up an easy way to
test things.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-11-08 01:37:14 | Re: Re: BUG #13755: pgwin32_is_service not checking if SECURITY_SERVICE_SID is disabled |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-11-07 22:20:08 | Re: BUG #14416: checkpoints never completed |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2016-11-08 01:35:23 | Re: Measuring replay lag |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-11-08 00:52:27 | Re: pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability |