From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5) |
Date: | 2014-09-04 00:39:37 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqTYGCpsA8Hk039SL=27FNGWmTd_b89NKb+P-YMaZ8oRZA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | Postg배트맨 토토SQL |
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:
> I committed the redo-routine refactoring patch. I kept the XLog prefix in
> the XLogReadBufferForRedo name; it's redundant, but all the other similar
> functions in xlogutils.c use the XLog prefix so it would seem inconsistent
> to not have it here.
Thanks! Even that will be helpful for a potential patch doing
consistency comparisons of FPW with current pages having WAL of a
record applied.
> I'll post a new version of the main patch shortly...
Looking forward to seeing it.
Regards,
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2014-09-04 00:39:41 | Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5) |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2014-09-04 00:33:31 | Re: Display of timestamp in pg_dump custom format |