| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, PostgreSQL Bugs List <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Confusing error message with too-large file in pg_basebackup |
| Date: | 2015-11-24 14:22:58 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqT_ek4ezPqxd6gXWHxQW721Qf_YR+eMWvSUtawK1p=_=A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>wrote:
> These all seem to me to be must-fix issues even if we didn't want to
> back-port use of the base-256 convention. Seeing that we have to deal
> with these things, I'm inclined to just back-port the whole patch to
> all branches.
>
FWIW, patch has been pushed as 00cdd83 and backpatched down to 9.1.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | pinker | 2015-11-24 15:34:47 | Re: pg_dump - wrong order with inheritance |
| Previous Message | Glauco Torres | 2015-11-24 12:54:21 | Re: [BUGS] postgresql downgrade issue |