From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Validate page level checksums in base backups |
Date: | 2018-04-06 20:28:05 |
Message-ID: | CABUevEzZ55qgLVtMxW=hXhzjHV3oU-gChpeKtufyf_siL-rBWg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | PostgreSQL : PostgreSQL pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 2:41 PM, Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 01:02:27PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 8:22 PM, Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de
> >
> > wrote:
> > > Otherwise, I had a quick look and there is no obvious outlier; the
> > > pgdata is 220 MB after the testrun (195 MB of which is WAL, maybe that
> > > could be cut down somehow?) and the base backups are 22-40 MB each, and
> > > there is around 20 of them, so that adds up to more than 750 MB.
> >
> > It certainly seems reasonable to delete the base backups once they're
> made,
> > after each step, rather than keeping them around forever.
>
> I had a look at this and found a copy-pasto in one of the test cases
> while testing, patch attached.
>
Cute. Applied.
I've also attached a second patch (that applies on top of the first)
> that removes the base backups once they are no longer needed, also
> attached (but see below).
>
> > Do we have a precedent somewhere for how we do this, or does our test
> > framework already have a way to do it? How are all the actual data
> > directories etc cleaned up?
>
> They (and the base backups) are getting purged on success of the whole
> testsuite. So to be clear - we are not leaving behind 1 GB of disk space
> on success, but we use 1 GB of disk space during the test.
>
> > Or should it just be a matter of sprinkling some unlink() calls
> throughout
> > the test file?
>
> I used rmtree() from File::Path (which is also used by PostgresNode to
> clean up) to remove them during the run.
>
>
This seems fine to me. Applied as well.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2018-04-06 20:28:06 | pgsql: Fix typo |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-04-06 19:52:03 | pgsql: Faster partition pruning |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bossart, Nathan | 2018-04-06 20:29:33 | Re: BUG #14941: Vacuum crashes |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-04-06 20:28:00 | Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning |