Re: PostGIS 2.1 removed from Debian Wheezy 7.6 Backports

Apparently I was sorely off-base - I'd been sourcing mine from the
http.debian.org repo, which apparently has changed.

My apologies.

On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Christoph Berg <cb(at)df7cb(dot)de> wrote:

> Re: Dan Fowler 2014-10-07 <CACg1cLROECFTGk01gEP5sMK0NNHd0dCzb2AqNMyzFd3=
> utbe0A(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
> > Christoph,
> >
> > Yes - it does persist.
> >
> > root(at)qdb92-test:~# apt-get update
> > [...successful update run...]
> > root(at)qdb92-test:~# apt-get install postgresql-9.1-postgis-2.1
> > Reading package lists... Done
> > Building dependency tree
> > Reading state information... Done
> > E: Unable to locate package postgresql-9.1-postgis-2.1
> > E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'postgresql-9.1-postgis-2.1'
> >
> > Is it possible that adding the apt.postgresql.org repo and key would fix
> > the issue, or could that create dependency/version issues between my
> > current deployments (PostgreSQL 9.1 with PostGIS 2.1.3)?
>
> Uh, what do you mean by "adding the apt.postgresql.org repo"? Where
> else did you get the package from before?
>
> We don't offer 2.1.3 anymore, the current version is now 2.1.4. (It
> would be nice if our repo could also host older package versions, but
> so far we don't have software for that.)
>
> The current state of the package on wheezy/amd64 looks like this:
>
> # apt-cache policy postgresql-9.1-postgis-2.1
> postgresql-9.1-postgis-2.1:
> Installed: (none)
> Candidate: 2.1.4+dfsg-1.pgdg70+3
> Version table:
> 2.1.4+dfsg-1.pgdg70+3 0
> 500 http://apt.postgresql.org/pub/repos/apt/ wheezy-pgdg/main
> amd64 Packages
>
> What does yours look like?
>
> Christoph
> --
> cb(at)df7cb(dot)de | http://www.df7cb.de/
>

--
*Dan Fowler*
DevOps Engineer

*MindMixer*
1735 Baltimore
Kansas City, MO 64108