From: | Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Gerdan Santos <gerdan(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: \timing interval |
Date: | 2016-09-01 18:38:17 |
Message-ID: | CADkLM=dV2ZuzfW0OCG48ucdYdWP8sF4GZ_QDeB-jouFcrYjRUg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | Postg범퍼카 토토SQL |
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I wrote:
> > So for clarity's sake: first suitable format among these:
>
> > Time: 59.999 ms
> > Time: 121.999 ms (2:01.999)
> > Time: 10921.999 ms (3:02:01.999)
> > Time: 356521.999 ms (4 3:02:01.999)
>
> Sorry, that probably added no clarity at all, I was confusing
> seconds with milliseconds in the example values :-(
>
> regards, tom lane
>
I didn't scan your examples for correctness, but the parentheticals matched
my own idea for what "left-trimmed" meant.
I'm going to hold off a bit to see if anybody else chimes in, and if not
I'm going to deliver a patch.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2016-09-01 18:38:49 | Re: autonomous transactions |
Previous Message | Joel Jacobson | 2016-09-01 18:35:13 | Re: autonomous transactions |