| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Yuqi Gu <Yuqi(dot)Gu(at)arm(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Optimize Arm64 crc32c implementation in Postgresql |
| Date: | 2018-05-02 23:20:36 |
| Message-ID: | CAEepm=3i1yT+YowKA_Byh5_Yqget93if4pheksUAMaHA1f+6jA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I don't have any way to test this, but it looks plausible, so pushed.
>
> (I note you forgot to run autoheader, btw.)
Thanks!
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2018-05-02 23:38:53 | Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled? |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2018-05-02 23:06:24 | Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled? |