| From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Curing plpgsql's memory leaks for statement-lifespan values |
| Date: | 2016-07-24 13:12:51 |
| Message-ID: | CAFiTN-uLBa3KOUUXGGWn9rxXgkc0MkBCJ4jKeon7p84+qEqw2A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | Postg토토 핫SQL : |
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> In short, why do you think
> it is better to create a new context rather than using "SPI Exec"?
>
I think life span of the memory allocated from "SPI Exec" is only within
"Executor", and after that SPI_Exec
will be reset. But many places we need such memory beyond "Executor"(including
one which is reported in above issue).
If we see below example of exec_stmt_dynexecute.
exec_stmt_dynexecute
{
....
querystr = pstrdup(querystr);
SPI_Execute --> inside this SPI_Exec context will be reset.
After this querystr is being used in this function.
}
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-07-24 15:47:55 | Re: Curing plpgsql's memory leaks for statement-lifespan values |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-07-24 12:18:45 | Re: Re: GiST optimizing memmoves in gistplacetopage for fixed-size updates [PoC] |