| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Astapov <dastapov(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #17619: AllocSizeIsValid violation in parallel hash join |
| Date: | 2022-09-27 16:13:02 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-Wz=+K9K+RYKLyDbPsp_gKfM_2YS-8zU4NxDY+EJ132cLMw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 6:31 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> Uh, why is it okay that we don't zero-initialize memory used for
> things like PARALLEL_KEY_BUFFER_USAGE and PARALLEL_KEY_WAL_USAGE?
Ping? I'm pretty sure that this needs to be fixed.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-09-27 16:24:08 | Re: BUG #17619: AllocSizeIsValid violation in parallel hash join |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-09-27 15:51:45 | Re: BUG #17385: "RESET transaction_isolation" inside serializable transaction causes Assert at the transaction end |