| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CREATE COLLATION does not sanitize ICU's BCP 47 language tags. Should it? |
| Date: | 2017-09-29 23:38:00 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-Wz=REBtBRLDXeFYuZW=84Or5H2jmRBwd_ve1Wijy308HfA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Reading over this code again, it is admittedly not quite clear why this
> "canonicalization" is in there right now. I think it had something to
> do with how we built the keyword variants at one point. It might not
> make sense. I'd be glad to take that out and use the result straight
> from uloc_getAvailable() for collcollate. That is, after all, the
> "canonical" version that ICU chooses to report to us.
Is anything going to happen here ahead of shipping v10? This remains
an open item.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-09-29 23:42:02 | 64-bit queryId? |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2017-09-29 23:36:55 | Re: Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation) |