From: | John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data |
Date: | 2018-04-05 20:35:23 |
Message-ID: | CAJVSVGVS59Lr248HbA561ReCMncxTgEHx=hty4OPBQejqixHnA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | Postg토토 꽁 머니SQL |
On 4/5/18, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I've generalized the BKI_LOOKUP(pg_proc) code so that
> you can use either regproc-like or regprocedure-like notation, and then
> applied that to relevant columns.
> [...]
> bootstrap-v13-delta.patch is a diff atop your patch series for the
> in-tree files, and convert_oid2name.patch adjusts that script to
> make use of the additional conversion capability.
Looking at convert_oid2name.patch again, I see this:
+ elsif ($catname eq 'pg_am')
+ {
+ $values{aggfnoid} = lookup_procname($values{aggfnoid});
+ }
aggfnoid is in pg_aggregate, and pg_am already had a regproc lookup.
Do you remember the intent here?
-John Naylor
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2018-04-05 20:46:26 | Re: Parallel Aggregates for string_agg and array_agg |
Previous Message | Bossart, Nathan | 2018-04-05 20:29:38 | Re: BUG #14941: Vacuum crashes |