| From: | Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Overeager spam fighting for link? |
| Date: | 2025-02-19 03:01:08 |
| Message-ID: | CAKAnmmJFPfDB4C=PJKwV_u_cDu=2LxDjs70q=k0bWOiupfToUA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Yes, but surely our script can be taught that \bhttps://\S* should be
excluded from the munging?
Secondarily, maybe make the web server smart enough to undo and redirect
the (and) (at) stuff that would otherwise be 404?
Cheers,
Greg
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Maciek Sakrejda | 2025-02-19 18:05:21 | Broken layout: CommitFest Add Review Form (still) |
| Previous Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2025-02-19 01:12:48 | Re: Overeager spam fighting for link? |