| From: | Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>, david(at)pgmasters(dot)net, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Cary Huang <cary(dot)huang(at)highgo(dot)ca>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Logging which local address was connected to in log_line_prefix |
| Date: | 2025-04-07 00:49:50 |
| Message-ID: | CAKAnmmKQfoud2PjWtY6j4BhgpKhimbCMZry_NXq7UDtT2TFPDg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | Postg젠 토토SQL : |
On Sun, Apr 6, 2025 at 6:01 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> 1. Ignore the inconsistency, commit 0004 as-is.
>
> 2. Change the output to be an empty string in background processes.
> This is consistent, but it goes against our upthread feeling that
> "[none]" would avoid confusion.
>
I lean for #1. Yes, there is some inconsistency, but it feels like the
right thing to do, and this is a feature I suspect not many people will use
anyway.
--
Cheers,
Greg
--
Crunchy Data - https://www.crunchydata.com
Enterprise Postgres Software Products & Tech Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2025-04-07 00:54:46 | Re: per backend WAL statistics |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2025-04-07 00:43:39 | Re: Possibly hard-to-read message |