| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats |
| Date: | 2022-02-03 04:48:28 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwba8iE+vp3EqXXihtNASomo9b-MnUjHHrG5R95sqQ2qGw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wednesday, February 2, 2022, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> and have other error
> information in pg_stat_subscription_workers view.
>
What benefit is there to keeping the existing collector-based
pg_stat_subscripiton_workers view? If we re-write it using shmem IPC then
we might as well put everything there and forego using a catalog. Then it
behaves in a similar manner to pg_stat_activity but for logical replication
workers.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2022-02-03 04:58:53 | Re: 2022-01 Commitfest |
| Previous Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2022-02-03 04:46:26 | Re: support for CREATE MODULE |