From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: smallint out of range EXECUTEing prepared statement |
Date: | 2017-01-18 22:25:58 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwbuaX8M-9v2MzkcuZcF6MVCW_Ym2tnxkMa7nyY=3YNX=Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:
> Is this expected behavior ?
>
> ts=# SELECT * FROM t WHERE site_id=32768 LIMIT 1;
> (0 rows)
>
> ts=# PREPARE x AS SELECT * FROM t WHERE site_id=$1 LIMIT 1;
> PREPARE
> ts=# EXECUTE x(32768);
> ERROR: smallint out of range
>
Probably. If you show the definition of "t", or at least "t.site_id",
that can be confirmed.
And, IMO, this question is more in line with the purpose of the -general
list.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2017-01-18 22:27:40 | Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function |
Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2017-01-18 22:15:30 | smallint out of range EXECUTEing prepared statement |