| From: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Logical Replication - detail message with names of missing columns |
| Date: | 2020-10-05 14:29:55 |
| Message-ID: | CALj2ACV73-dSe0-8E4SWaZLSrMKjTpDPpWGZ+fB9dUmwGuAnwg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thanks Amit for the review comments. I will post an updated patch soon.
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 9:39 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> 6. I think we should add one test case for this in the existing
> regression test (src/test/subscription/t/008_diff_schema).
>
This patch logs the missing column names message in subscriber server
logs. Is there a way to see the logs in these tests and use that as
expected result for the test case?
With Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2020-10-05 14:34:05 | Re: Use standard SIGHUP and SIGTERM handlers in autoprewarm module |
| Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2020-10-05 14:27:41 | Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods |