| From: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Sigh, we need an initdb |
| Date: | 2014-06-04 21:14:23 |
| Message-ID: | CAM-w4HPq13KRB8SSwV35Nw_LJ+BM0H0B9DnfHdfCPypNJrM8fw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Other things I'd like to change in that case:
Fwiw I tried to use the pg_lsn data type the other day and pretty much
immediately ran into the lack of the btree operator class. Pretty much
the first thing I did when I loaded the data was "select ... order by
lsn".
--
greg
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2014-06-04 21:16:28 | Re: Sigh, we need an initdb |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-06-04 21:03:52 | Re: Sigh, we need an initdb |